Mayan Body Modifications

Long standing emphasis on architecture, which abounds with images of adorned individuals, has traditionally overshadowed the astonishing physical characteristics of the humans who built these magnificent cities and monuments to ancient civilization as well as to their gods and themselves. Body modifications served a purpose within their society that appeased their gods, rulers, and served an aesthetic purpose. These adornments were a social signifier of a person’s social status, with the rulers having a greater quantity of adornments, due to greater participation in rituals, as well as the highest quality jewelry. The Mayans pierced their bodies, not as we understand it today in the sense of adornment; rather they shed their blood in rites of sacrifice to their gods, or to keep the universe alive (Rush).

Mayan civilization reached its greatest florescence in the Classic period and was culturally, politically, and economically effected by developments in Central Mexico. Maya writings were meant as permanent records to proclaim genealogy, rituals and great deeds, and to legitimize rulers. The royal culture of Maya was that of political authority and quasi-divine status. Rule was based on a patriarchal lineage, with a rule of queens emerging only when a dynasty might otherwise be extinguished. Rulers were depicted sitting on jaguar skinned cushions, elaborate headdresses of jade, shell, mosaic, and plumage, holding a scepter carved into an image of K’awiil. Upon their deaths they were dressed, adorned, and accompanied by offerings. They believed that men and women were complementary opposites. The right side of the body is male, the left side is female, and an adult has to be married to be a whole person. The man plants and harvests while the woman cooks. A man also cannot hold a position without a wife to support him (Martin and Grube).

The classic Maya representations of the human body are unusually expressive, with a degree of naturalism that is deceptively transparent to western gaze. Classic Maya art is highly conventionalized and the western distinction between image and original collapses into shared identities and presences, involving effigies that both represent and are the things they portray. Attention to details of the body and clothing probably did not arise from the doctrine of shared identities, since these concepts pervade other more schematic representational styles of Mesoamerica, but they do indicate a strategy of depiction that emphasizes the recording of minute details, including those of faces and bodies in torment, lust and grief, and stresses close observation of an external world. These images provide sufficient raw material for understanding how certain passions were selected for display and what was meant by them (Houston).

Before humans could significantly affect their environment, a great deal of effort was placed on the emphasis of the self. In addition to tattooing, scarification, skull binding and heavy dental alterations that include inlays and filing, ear, lip, and septum piercing was prevalent in most Mesoamerican cultures. The nearly universal process of ritualized adornment, traditionally enacted by elders or priests, permanently altered the flesh of the individual, and that healed tissue, which would later be enlarged to greater proportions contained within it jewelry. This jewelry and process of enlargement further defined the individual within his or her physical and spiritual world and within the cosmos and nature, and as an individual with in a tribe (Perlingieri).

Historically, most great civilizations were pierced, tattooed, or otherwise adorned in the fashion of their cultures. The aesthetic of the tribe was embodied in its kings and queens as well as the common citizens, as piercing is one of the most enduring human rituals, and jewelry making among the oldest human art forms. Much emphasis was focused around the ritual of a first piercing, which were often a rite of passage and a sign of beauty and tribal status. The piercing would necessitate the permanent modification of the body, as the process of enlarging the piercing required years to complete.

Ancient Maya men and women wore the same kinds of jewelry, except that women did not wear lip or nose plugs (Foster). The nose plugs were sanctioned for an elite status symbol among men, mainly during the Terminal Classic Period. The plugs, lip, nose and ear, were two-piece assemblages with a ring secured in the body by a thick plug. The earplugs were usually so heavy that they would distort the ear lobe, similar to modern ear plugs. These plugs were usually made from jade, semiprecious stones and shell. However, by the Early Post classic Period the jadeite resources were nearly used up, so turquoise and serpentine were used more frequently.

maya2Certainly the Maya people did pierce their ears and other areas for adornment as well as for self-mortification.  From the sculpture and wall paintings we can see they loved abundant and luxurious ornamentation.  They practiced infant head shaping, eye crossing, and body paint.  Noses, lips, septum, and ears were all pierced and adorned with expensive jewelry to show the wearer’s status. Genital mutilation is well documented and referred to in frequent visual metaphors (Christensen). Lips, noses, and earlobes were pierced and decorated with expensive jewelry.  Body modification was also considered a badge of courage, as we deem it today.

Ritualized as a child’s first ear piercing, a small human is physically indoctrinated by an elder in his or her tribe. It also functions as a “tribal baptism”; baptism and birth ritual is a reoccurring motif in many cultures. Any parent understands the natural impulse to dress, decorate, and raise your child in the style in which you and your tribe identify with, culturally. It is basic human instinct, genetically programmed for thousands of years culture is constant. Ritual rites of passage leave a mark like a piercing scar or tattoo. Within this context the individual is defined as a member within the animal world, the tribe, and the cosmos. Born without spots, stripes, or bright plumage, piercing and all ancient forms of body ornamentation is a uniquely human intervention; in fact it is a necessity (Perlingieri).

In Mayan societies, wood, bone, clay, or other more modest materials were employed by the peasant, or lower class. Graduated plugs were usual, but multiple twigs in the same hole were also used by those of limited means or as a sign of subjugation of those who had been stripped of rank. The relationship and symbiosis of adornment, culture, and ritual are inextricably woven (Perlingieri).

The Maya were master stone carvers who favored jade, jadeite, or nephrite, which symbolized fertility and harvest. They fashioned floral ear assemblages (Figure 2), some counter weighted, in endless variety. Gold symbolized the spirit world and the sun, and was the first and most enduring symbol of beauty and wealth in ancient culture. Both chronologically and geographically, many Mesoamerican civilizations traded goods and exchanged jewelry making techniques, information, and artisans. This is notable in the overlay and continuation of Olmec type imagery in Mayan art.

Nobles were entombed with their finest jewelry to accompany them into the afterlife. As civilizations complexities developed, classes emerged; kings and queens always embody their cultures particular style of personal finery. Nobility always wore the finest jewelry that could be constructed. The Mayans and other Mesoamerican cultures had a timeless fascination with gold and gem stones. Prominent awl-like needles often identified as sting ray spines, which are often found in tombs of buried Maya rulers in the pelvic area of male skeletons. Besides the needle sharp sting ray spines, excavators also discovered pointed blades of chipped flint and obsidian, awls of animal and human bone, as well as effigies made of precious jade. The central function of his duty and privilege of rank, by piercing his penis to bring forth the flow of “blue” blood, the Maya believed he sustained and nourished the land and its people. The triadic emblem of kingship common to the Maya area from earliest times contains as a central element, the upright spine of the sting ray. The “personified lancet” is thought to be an avatar of the deified flint knife, whose cutting edge is yet an aspect of the “smoking mirror” patron of princes and ruler of fate (Vale).

The sacrifice of the king is a theme which is recognized world-wide and is celebrated still in many cultures and many religions.  The Mayan king’s blood had special powers to restore and nourish the land.  The ruler and his nobles would pierce their tongues and genitals using obsidian knives, awls, and spines from the stingray or the maguey cactus, letting the blood drip into bowls set with paper blotters, which would then be ceremoniously burned as offerings (Figure 3). Sting ray spines were often found buried near the pelvic regions of male rulers.

Mayans offered sacrifices of their own blood, sometimes cutting themselves into pieces and leaving them in this way as a sign, other times they pierced their cheeks, and at other times their lower lips. Sometimes they scarify certain parts of their bodies, at others they pierced their tongues in a slanting direction from side to side and passed bits of straw through the holes with horrible suffering. They anointed the idol with blood which flowed from all these parts, and he who did this the most was considered the bravest, and their sons from the earliest age began to practice it.

Known to the Mayans rather prosaically as K’awiil and his association with the royal families in the late classic period seems to have been popularized by a dynasty at Palenque, which claimed certain congenital deformities as evidence of their divine kinship with this deity. The founder of this ruling family, Pakal, had inherited club foot which he likened to K’awiil’s snake foot.

Shield Jaguar, five days after he assumed the title of blood lord of Yaxchilan, performed the bloodletting rite, and is shown here supervising the tongue piercing ritual ceremony as it is performed by his principal wife lady Xoc (Figure 4). He wears a shrunken trophy head on his own and carries a staff which resembles the enormous tobacco smoking tubes used by warao on the orinoco today. Lady Xoc pulls a cord studded with maguey thrones through a hole in her tongue, the flaming designs of her mouth tattoo indicates the type of event her act is a part of, seeking a vision (Vale).

The Hero Twins, Hunahpu and Xbalanque, while on a hunting trip, shoot Vucub Caquix in the jaw with a blowgun, causing him to fall out of the tree he was sitting in eating fruit.   Angered, Vucub Caquix tears off Hunahpu’s arm, and in order to recover the arm, the twins pose as dentists. They travel to Vucub Caquix’ house, and trick him into letting them pull his teeth to which they replace them with white maize kernels, while the arm is being retrieved. With his new corn dentures, Vucub Caquix no longer looked like a lord, so he died in poverty (Tedlock).

The corn cycle is intrinsically important to the Maya, beliefs about the spirit and nature of corn are paramount in their mythology. The Maya believe that corn has a spirit or soul, although how that essence is perceived or categorized varies slightly from region to region. they go to great lengths to ensure the spirit of the corn is not harmed, treating kernels of corn with respect, and holding every kernel in high esteem (Sweet). However, when Vucub Caquix was looked upon with his maize dentures he no longer appeared lordly because his teeth that had been painstakingly inlayed with precious stones were no longer part of his façade. The hero twins effectively stripped Vacub Caquix of his identity and title by merely removing his teeth. It is this stripping that diminished his status to that of poverty where he succumbed to death.

Continuing with ancient Maya jewelry, archaeologists have found evidence of teeth filing and inlays (Miller). All social classes of the Maya would file their teeth into points or other ornamental shapes. However, only the elite classes would drill holes in their teeth and place jade, hematite, turquoise or pyrite inlays in them. The Mayans had highly developed dental skills, not acquired for oral health or personal adornment but probably for ritual or religious purposes. They were able to place carved stone inlays into prepared cavities in live front teeth, in people’s mouths (Figure 5). A round, copper tube similar in shape to a drinking straw, was spun between the hands or in a rope drill, with slurry of powered quartz in water as the abrasive, cutting a round hole through the enamel. The stone inlay was ground to fit exactly into the cavity. These inlays were made of a variety of minerals of beautiful colors, including jadeite, iron pyrites, hematite, turquoise, quartz, serpentine and cinnabar . Like the act of tattooing, both filing and drilling were very painful.

A tattoo is more than a painting on skin, its meaning and reverberations cannot be comprehended without knowledge of the history and mythology of its bearer. Thus it is a pure poetic creation and is always more than meets the eye. As a tattoo is grounded on living skin, so its essence emotes poignancy unique to the mortal human condition. Piercing also underscored the difference between primitive humans and the animal world. It can also be stated that as the sophistication of jewelry making and the adornment process developed, so too did the complexity of a cultures concept and use of ritual, spirituality and the supernatural world, and ultimately religion (Vale).

Tattoos in ancient Maya culture were common in that both women and men had them, although men did not tattoo before marriage (Foster). The process of tattooing was fairly simple, although extremely painful. First, the intended design would be painted on the body. Then, the design would be cut into the flesh. The mixture of paint and the resulting scar would produce the tattoo. Getting a tattoo was a sign of great personal bravery because it usually caused an infection that resulted in interim illness. Tattoos were also used as a form of punishment; if a nobleman committed a crime; he was obliged to have his entire face tattooed as a representation of his crime.

In lintel 16 (Figure 6) a captured ruler is depicted on his knees and biting his fist in an act of submission in the presence of his captor, Bird Jaguar. There is a rope around his neck belaying the potential of him having been tied up. Normally rulers wear earspools of jade or other fine materials, but here he has been stripped of his finery and wears paper in his ear. Stripping captives of all their finery is an act of domination, it takes away their identity, clothing is important it identifies status, location, a number of things that leaves him more or less naked in front of his capturer. In a ritual context, paper is used to soak up the spilled blood so that it can be burned to nourish the patron deity of the performer.

It is possible that the men wanted to look like Pakal, who ruled the city of Palenque. Few ancient Maya remains have been as thoroughly studied as Pakal’s. His tomb within Palenque’s Temple of the Inscriptions provides a clear view of the standard of beauty to which ancient Maya men aspired. The earliest image of Pakal, a profile carving on an oval tablet found in his royal palace, emphasizes his flattened forehead. His simply rendered body reveals a slim physique. Pakal also had luxuriant hair, which he wore in thick, layered tresses trimmed to blunt ends in the front and tied in the back. His hair flopped forward like corn silk surrounded by leaves at the top of a healthy maize plant. Because each kernel on a cob requires a strand of silk to be pollinated, abundant corn silk pointed to a healthy cob of maize and Pakal’s hair indicated his maize like perfection.

Maya standards of beauty based on the Maize God applied to men as well as women. K’inich Janaab’ Pakal (Pakal the Great), is shown on the lid of his sarcophagus wearing the Maize God’s jade skirt. It is the same skirt his mother is shown wearing on an oval tablet from the royal palace at Palenque. Women’s skulls were also bound into elongated shapes, and they filed their teeth or drilled holes in them to hold inlays of jade, pyrite, hematite, or turquoise. Another fashion that men and women shared was painting their bodies with abstract designs (Miller).

It has been commonly established throughout the years that jewelry in the archaeological record is vastly important for many reasons, including giving archaeologists tangible evidence of what they see the ancient Maya wearing in depictions on murals or pottery and for ascertaining if trade existed between Maya cities or even other cultures, such as the Aztecs or some Caribbean cultures. When jewelry is found, it becomes possible for archaeologists to reconstruct a general image of what the ancient Maya wore in their daily lives, in religious ceremonies and in times of warfare. In addition, determining what materials the jewelry is made from, such as shell or jade, may help archaeologists clarify where the materials came from, giving hints about contact and trade. Since much of the jewelry the ancient Maya created does not degrade rapidly in the archaeological record, it will continue to be a source of much information for archaeologists.

Body modifications made by the Mayans were as much ritual as they were adornment, serving as visual signifiers of bravery and social class. From the current knowledge of Mayan societies, it is understood that bloodletting rituals were prevalent, cultural identity was linked to appearances, and their history was explained through mythology.Due to missionary contact and western encroachment in general, which includes the depletion of the environment, most tribes are disappearing along with what is left of their native rainforest. These things and the long arm of our righteous western morality have destroyed many primitive cultures and their mythologies (Perlingieri). The resources available for discerning Mayan myths and artifacts are limited, many of these have been tampered with, resulting in the original location being unknown. There have been innumerable leaps in understanding over the years, but there remains a lot left to learn about this culture.


Rush, John A, Spiritual Tattoo: A Cultural History of Tattooing, Piercing, Scarification, Branding & Implants, 2003

Martin, Simon, and Nikolai Grube. Chronicle of the Maya kings and queens: deciphering the

dynasties of the ancient Maya. London: Thames & Hudson, 2000. Print.

Houston , Stephen. “Decorous Bodies and Disordered Passions: Representations of Emotion among the Classic Maya.” World Archaeology 33.2 (2001): 206-219. JSTOR. Web. 4 Apr. 2013.

Perlingieri, Blake Andrew. A brief history of the evolution of body adornment in Western culture: ancient origins and today. United States: Tribalife Publications, 2003. Print.

Foster, Lynn V. Handbook to Life in the Ancient Maya World. 1st ed. 1. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Print.

Christensen, Wes, “A Fashion for Ecstasy; Ancient Maya Body Modifications” in Vale and Juno, Modern Primitives, Re/Search Publications, 1989

Vale, V., and Andrea Juno. Modern primitives: an investigation of contemporary adornment & ritual.. San Francisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1989. Print.

Tedlock, Dennis. Popol vuh: the definitive edition of the Mayan book of the dawn of life and the glories of gods and kings. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985. Print.

Sweet, Karen. Maya sacred geography and the creator deities. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008. Print.

Miller, Mary. “Extreme Makeover.” Archaeology. January 2009: 1. Web. 13 April 2013.

Ethel Granger

ImageEthel Mary Wilson was born in 1905, she was a plain unsophisticated girl who wore the shapeless dresses of the 1920’s until she met a young astronomer named William Arnold Granger whom she married in 1928. William told Ethel about his appreciation for corsets and expressed his wish to feel one around the waist of his wife. One day, Ethel asked William to put his arms around her waist and to his surprise he felt a pair of corsets that tied Ethel into 24 inches, more or less her natural waist line. From here the process of Ethel’s metamorphosis began.

ImageShe began wearing a corset day and night to reduce her waist size. After several years the result was ethel’s legendary 13 inch waist, the smallest waist ever recorded on the 50’s institution The Guinness Book of Records. One cannot deny that William was one of the harshest task masters in the history of fashion. Ethel was a product of fashion and sexual fetish. Her husband believed that fashion influenced the structure of our most intimate thoughts. When William and Ethel married in 1928, she wore very high heels, beautiful earrings, and a short knee-length skirt. A corset completed her outfit. After the birth of their daughter Ethel’s breasts had become larger, like any man William was excited by this change, unfortunately this change did not last, and so he suggested wearing gold rings in her nipples, which she refused at first.

ImageIn the Woman’s Sunday Mirror of June 16, 1967 Ethel was photographed wearing five inch heels and a black leather belt over her dress, she was now 52 years of age and a mother of a 27 year old daughter. Her final measurements were 36/13/38. Ethel had 12 piercings in each ear, eleven holes ran along the edge, and one was placed in the middle called a Conch. She also had each of her cheeks pierced, a Medusa and Laberate, both nipples, each side of her nose, and two piercings in her septum. William had stretched one of her septums, both nipples, conch, and lobe piercings. He had stretched her lobes so that daylight could be seen through, he was scared to go any further than 8mm due to the skin being so thin, and eventually he convinced her to stretch her nipples in an attempt to enlarge her breasts. At first she wasn’t comfortable wearing her jewlery and showing her figure off in public but after the war, with the change in fashion, Ethel and William began breaking down barriers. The septum rings she had worn in the privacy of their home for the pleasure of her husband was worn in public and she no longer hide the numerous piercings in her ears with her hair.

Avant Garde: Engaging with the World

The dealer critic system is established causing the avant garde to become very popular. the dealer critic system still governs our art system today. the dealer needs money and space, they also need someone to bring hype to certain works or artist, this is where the critic comes in, they help the dealer to know what to chose to buy and sell. and this replaces the salon system, it presents a problem because it all determined by a circuit that depends on generating a profit and art is now a business. 

Surrealism and photography are a very appropriate pair, the less doctored and the more naive a photograph is, the more authoritative it will be. The idea of chance is very important and they welcome the uninvited and the disorderly. Man Ray’s Minotaur is actually made up of the torso of a nude woman’s body. The minotaur in greek mythology is kept imprisoned in a labyrinth on the island of crete, cretan youth were sacrificed to it. The minotaur and his labyrinth were another potent symbol for the surrealist due to the minotaur collapsing the human and animal instincts. symbols of the unconscious mind and also the bestial nature or those instincts within every human. They want to liberate suppressed repressed instincts. it is familiar but is made to be unfamiliar, we see this other imagery in it, dual imagery, makes you doubt what you are looking at. The figure of the woman is also very important to the surrealist she is a well spring or muse of creativity because she herself is irrational and emotional. She symbolizes the unconscious and irrational as well. Her body is creating the head of a monster with her nipples as the eyes and her arms its horns, beauty and monstrosity are made into one, suggesting they are projections of our own desires.    

Duchamp created Fountain as an assisted ready made in 1920. This is his most famous readymade, it was exhibited in 1916 in the 291 gallery a photographers gallery in new York. The show stated that all works would be accepted due to it being a nonjuried show. He submitted this work under the name, Richard Mutt, and after much debate, the board memebers hide it from veiw disregarding their previous statement. After that decision Duchamp resigned from the board. They found this work to be disgusting, not art. Dada was breaking away from orderly and perfectly placed items, allowing the viewer to be impulsive (Tzara).  Regardless of whether or not he made this with his own hands he chose it and creates a new thought for this item. Shifting art from being a physical craft to a mental interpretation. 

Picasso Guernica is the most famous response to the bombing of Guernica. At the time Picasso was living in Paris when he was approached to do a mural for the Paris Exhibition of 1937. The artist in this movement  weren’t necessarily political but when events happen at such an extreme it isn’t escapable. The official theme of the Paris exhibition was the celebration of technology, the organizers hoped that this would bring a vision of a bright future to break the nations out of their depression and social unrest, of course this is the very same technology that can cause results such as Guernica, providing a biting satyr just in its placement in this exhibition. The overall scene is suggestive of an interior room that seems to be crumbling down around the figures, allowing for peeks onto the outside world. On the left there is a wide eyed bull standing above a woman holding a dead child in her arms, in the center there is a horse that is falling in agony. Notice that the tongues of the horse and the bull are these knife like blades and the cubist fracturing seems to very much work for a scene of such destruction and anarchy. There is a large gapping wound in the horse’s side that seems to be the focus of the painting as it is falling in agony. There are supposedly two hidden images, skulls overlaying the horses body and a bull appears to gore the bull from underneath. Basically it is a scene of horror and terror. On the right there is a figure sweeping in holding a lantern, possibly a symbol of hope, bearing witness to this tragedy. She is a figure of ourselves, because if we witness this and remember it we still have hope. The limited palate was influenced by the numerous photographs taken after the bombing. The painting itself was kept away and put in a corner at the exhibition, following the exhibition it toured around the world, the only place it didn’t go was Spain. Picasso didn’t want it to return there until the entire country could enjoy public liberties and democratic institutions.

Avant Garde: European Reaction

Klee painted the Revolution of the Viaduct after the Nazi art exhibition with a kind of veiled criticism that you have to work for. These are rebellious arches, used to be orderly arches in a row but they have sprung free from their regimented set way, displaying different sizes, colors, some have two arches, and they seem to be marching in a kind of group. they are escaping from conformity and prompting their own individuality. this could be a reaction towards the increasing Nazi party and the way they could move the masses. The point is being made that the practical really is at the same time the beautiful (Breuer).

As a part of purism in France, Leger 3 Women, is depicted using classical forms with sleek industrial machinery and commercial advertising and is suggestive of the three muses. His objects have no symbolism, no hidden iconography. its the play of shapes purely formal, employing objects for their design and density. using objects for their purity of form or simplifying their form to create a pure object that he can depict. he saw these pure forms as stabilizing designs as static but also dynamic in the patterns. acts as two dimensional sculptural forms with heavy outlines that bind an architecturally construct foundations, creating a solidity. The three women seem to have volume and heft and are shaded like a cubist painting. By using spheres columns and tubes Leger creates a cult of the object with disjointed nudes creating angular rhythms. The triangular forms are made of spheres and circles. He is disconnecting the body and recreating it, trying to create a rhythm but not trying to investigate the human body. The women are mass produced sameness, there is not individual differences between the figures. The objects in the work shows the cult of the objects. they are deprived of their humanity in that they are reduced to rhythms and shapes. drapes in the background create a rhythm with their hair, repetitive patterns interesting formal play. association of objects with consumers and the commercial aspect of life paralleled with the artistic. The intent is to show that art is still alive despite cultural situations that seems hostile to the essence of art. artist in the midst of the catastrophe have begun to ponder what is most immediate, certain, and durable truth craft (Hartlaub).

Picasso Guernica is the most famous response to the bombing of Guernica. At the time Picasso was living in Paris when he was approached to do a mural for the Paris Exhibition of 1937. The artist in this movement  weren’t necessarily political but when events happen at such an extreme it isn’t escapable. The official theme of the Paris exhibition was the celebration of technology, the organizers hoped that this would bring a vision of a bright future to break the nations out of their depression and social unrest, of course this is the very same technology that can cause results such as Guernica, providing a biting satyr just in its placement in this exhibition. The overall scene is suggestive of an interior room that seems to be crumbling down around the figures, allowing for peeks onto the outside world. On the left there is a wide eyed bull standing above a woman holding a dead child in her arms, in the center there is a horse that is falling in agony. Notice that the tongues of the horse and the bull are these knife like blades and the cubist fracturing seems to very much work for a scene of such destruction and anarchy. There is a large gapping wound in the horse’s side that seems to be the focus of the painting as it is falling in agony. There are supposedly two hidden images, skulls overlaying the horses body and a bull appears to gore the bull from underneath. Basically it is a scene of horror and terror. On the right there is a figure sweeping in holding a lantern, possibly a symbol of hope, bearing witness to this tragedy. She is a figure of ourselves, because if we witness this and remember it we still have hope. The limited palate was influenced by the numerous photographs taken after the bombing. The painting itself was kept away and put in a corner at the exhibition, following the exhibition it toured around the world, the only place it didn’t go was Spain. Picasso didn’t want it to return there until the entire country could enjoy public liberties and democratic institutions.

Avant-Garde: Challenging traditional definitions of the Art Object.

Dada is not unified by any single style and is an attack against  preconcieved notions, meant to challange the identification of art. This movement develops during the first world war and this is very significant in the development in Dada. The war crumbles the idea of civilized modernity, society, economics, and politics are all transformed as women enter the workforce. War is not an honorable and unifying thing in all cases, they begin to question technology for its responsibility in destroying human bodies and the scientific exploration that followed that began creating rudimentary prosthetics. Even though Duchamp vowed to give up painting he refuses to give up his interest in art he begins finding these objects called ready mades. The term ready made refers to any kind of prefabricated object that is isolated from its original context and elevated to the status of art. He is asking us how we define art and what we want from art, he is exploring the parameters that we have given to art, art is a cultural construction. He is questioning the role of an artist. Duchamp created Fountain as an assisted ready made in 1920. This is his most famous readymade, it was exhibited in 1916 in the 291 gallery a photographers gallery in new York. The show stated that all works would be accepted due to it being a nonjuried show. He submitted this work under the name, Richard Mutt, and after much debate, the board memebers hide it from veiw disregarding their previous statement. After that decision Duchamp resigned from the board. They found this work to be disgusting, not art. Dada was breaking away from orderly and perfectly placed items, allowing the viewer to be impulsive (Tzara).  Regardless of whether or not he made this with his own hands he chose it and creates a new thought for this item. Shifting art from being a physical craft to a mental interpretation.

The goal of the Bauhaus was to create a union between art and life that had been lost in Avant Garde art. This is the most successful Avant Garde movement in Germany and is sponsered by the government. Founded in 1919 by Walter Gropius, following the war and preceeding the Nazi Party, their two main interest were architecture and design. There was a rise in the middle class due to the florishing economic situation. during this time art flourishes and was geared towards this middle class. Gropius was taked with integreating traditional fine art with low art, such as arts and crafts, while remaining commited to functionalism. Their goal was to improve the workers enviroments will increase productivity by increasing the aethestic appeal of everyday objects. The Bauhaus reflected the unity of all arts wanting a utopian craft of a singlular expressive creation. Breuer was creating practical and functional art, made to suit the middle class when he created the Wassily Club Chair named after Wassily Kandinsky. This is one of the earliest examples made in the metal workshop, it is meant to be practical and functional in everyday life. This goal is achieved through reducing the chair to its most necessary elemants. Breuer said that the design was inspired by a bicycle in the sense that it is light weight and an easily mass produced product. All inessential details are subordinated to a great, simple representational form that finally, when its definitive shape has been found, must constitute the symbolic expression of the inner meaning of the modern artifact (Gropius). It is an important break through for The Bauhaus, it is light, cheap, and easy to make. There are a lot of different chair designs all lacking ornamentation with an affordable, streamlined function. Making it perfect for those of the middle class.

Surrealism is similar that of  dada sculpture, in that many of these are readymade. The purpose is to resolve the contradictory conditions of dream and fiction into absolute reality. the notion of the fetish comes into play, by dealing with objects that you can touch and feel. These artist are interested in the anti retinal and the accidental, bringing together unrelated elements in an unrelated space. Arp created Head with Three disagreeable objects as a biomorphic abstraction, which is anything rooted in the organic. We have to readjust our vision to think about this as an art object. It is not displayed on a pedestal perhaps it sits on the floor. The larger rock is actually a plaster object with three smaller objects sitting on top, that can be rearranged and are meant to be rearranged. Arp described this work in a story of waking up with these three annoying objects, a mustache, a mandolin, and a fly, on his face. There is a notion of physical reengagement, where the viewer is meant to finish the work. He is evoking a different kind of sensory perception, the hand rather than the eye. The point of this is the interaction. a level of chance, in an ideal world every viewer can interact and relate to these objects differently.

Un Chien Andalou

Un_Chien_Andalou

Surrealist artist were painting the unconscious mind, which resulted in non realistic art. These works are characterized by impossible scenes, illogical placement, and juxtaposed order. Artist like Dali experimented with free association and interpretation of dreams. During this time the human psyche was being explored by Sigmund Freud and his contemporaries, presenting the human mind in a way that had not previously been considered. The theory that is being sampled in Un Chien Andalou is the Oedipus concept.

So what is this Oedipus concept? Basically it has to do with the way children mentally and emotionally desire their parents, but more specifically how they think about the parent of the opposite sex. In classical Freudian psychoanalytic theory, the child’s identification with its same-sex parent is the successful resolution of the Oedipus complex. Freud further proposed that boys and girls experience the complexes differently: boys in a form of castration anxiety, girls in a form of penis envy; and that unsuccessful resolution of the complexes might lead to neurosis, pedophilia, and homosexuality. In adult life this can lead to a choice of a sexual partner who resembles one’s parents (Rycroft), taking the theory that we are attracted to people who remind us of our parents one step further.

The Film Un Chien Andalou was created in a dreamlike state were time and space are not to be trusted, neither have any relevance in the story. This undependable usage of time and space is disorienting to the viewer and shattering any expectations they might have. Its premise came from an encounter of two dreams that occurred separately to its creators. Luis Buñuel dreamed of a long tapering cloud slicing the moon in half, like a razor blade slicing through an eye, while Salvador Dali dreamed of a hand crawling with ants. Between the two of them, they agreed that no idea or image that might lend itself to a rational explanation of any kind would be accepted. They had to open all doors to the irrational and keep only those images that surprised them, without having to explain why (Buñuel). There are many interviews and retelling of stories from these two artist, that support the idea that this film did not have a hidden meaning or symbolic purpose, but our rational minds tell us otherwise.

To gently guide you into understanding the antics of these artist, lets take a step back and look at Dali’s  The Great Masturbator, he is bringing desire into this painting, which was a major aspect of surrealistic art because they are obsessed with Freudian concepts and with Freud everything is driven from desire. This painting contains various meanings of paranoia and delusion using a method that he calls paranoiac-critical method. This method means that he is assuming the mind of a mad man, however, he is not subject to paranoia, but he is trying to use delusion as an artistic mode of vision. The aspect of paranoia that Dali is interested in and which helped inspire his so called method was the ability of the brain to perceive links between things which rationally are not linked. He describes the paranoiac critical method as a spontaneous method of irrational knowledge based on the critical and systematic objectivity of the associations and interpretations of delirious phenomena. By definition this method is averting the rational binary opposition between right and wrong. The representation of an object is also the representation of an entirely different object that accommodates the consciousness of obsessive ideas of the individual. By exploiting theme of masturbation and its intended guilt; Dali is also expressing castration anxiety, as exemplified in the oedipal concept, as always leading us back to Freud.

The theme of masturbation is a part of a dream narrative where there is a strange rock profile that appears to be Salvador Dali’s own head, as if it were a self portrait, the eyes of the figure are closed suggesting that he is sleeping. Growing from the back of his head is the head of a woman who is shown nuzzling a flaccid penis and testicles, suggesting that this is a dirty dream but also a fear of impotence. There are ants crawling from a decaying body of a grasshopper, some of these ants are scurrying across where the mouth is supposed to be. The grasshopper signifies a kind of childhood trauma, but it is also being eaten suggesting how a praying mantis eats its lover after copulation. The woman has been suggested to be his wife or resembling his mother reenacting the consequences of an unsuccessful resolution of the oedipal concept.

Buñuel asked his mother for funds to film the Un Chien Andalou, not trusting production companies to capture the intended purity of emotions. With that money he hired Pierre Batcheff and Simone Mareuil as well as cameramen, and made a deal to use Billancourt studios. It only took two weeks to film and for the most part no one knew what they were doing, Dali could most often be found pouring wax into the eyes of stuffed donkeys. Once the film was edited, it was decided to keep it a secret, until a later decision was made to show it to fellow surrealist including Man Ray. Buñuel has been quoted as saying that he carried stones in his pocket, to throw at the audience in case of disaster. Luckily for him it was a success and Mauclaire of studio 28 bought the film (Buñuel). After the deal was made he was then faced with a serious moral problem that explains the surrealist morality. Initially it was whole heartedly accepted, but when the members of the surrealist group heard about him selling the film they accused him of selling out, and asked him to destroy the film in order to stop its publication.

The movie begins with “Once upon a time…” which is a statement that has a deep connection with childhood, followed by the opening scene where the viewer is greeted with a reference to a dream Buñuel had; the father slicing the mother’s eye, similar to how the clouds dissected the moon outside the balcony door, in order to extract the truth regarding the relationship between her and her son. Following this scene the story unfolds by showing an over grown child riding up the street with his hands on his thighs and covered in white frills, when he falls off the bike, symbolically showing the loss of his childhood innocence, and his mothers frantic run to his aid.

The young man’s mother laid out the contents of the striped box onto the bed, which consisted of his childhood school clothes. She sits in a chair by the bed as if to reminisce about her son as an innocent child, when something disturbs her, causing her to turn in the chair and to see her son standing in the corner of the room masturbating. Knowing that he has been caught he holds his hands up and they are covered in ants, which comes from a dream that Dali had as well as being one of his favorite metaphors.

The next scene toys with the idea of his unsuccessful resolution of the oedipal complex and how it could lead to homosexuality. As the mother and son look out the window at the commotion coming from the street, where there is an androgynous woman poking at a dismembered hand on the sidewalk. The dismembered hand symbolizes masturbatory shame, while the androgynous woman symbolizes the first thoughts of bisexuality in the young man’s developing interest in sex. A police officer places the hand in a stripped box and hands it to the woman, symbolizing his acceptance of the thought of bisexuality. As the mother and son continue to watch the scene unfold, he becomes excited by the impending violence of cars heading towards the woman, and then again when they hit her, symbolizing his dismissal of those thoughts.

At the close of this scene he sexually assaults his mother, by caressing her breast and while doing so he visualizes buttocks, and his eyes roll back into his head. The oedipal complex states that masturbation causes blindness, and perhaps this is what this scene is referring to. However, Aron says that in order to defy even desire, the body suppresses its sensuality by prescribing a slobbering, impotent mask with sorrowful upturned eyes for the lover who caresses naked breasts and buttocks. Shared desire for freedom rears up against the powers of their prison. A freedom that seems all the more complete as it obliterates its limits, a freedom that is quickly achieved in that space of our fantasy where all laws slacken, but freedom without vengeance, without real joy, without possession (Aron). As if awakening from this fantasy the son begins to crawl across the room to his mother, straining against Christian morals and the beliefs of classic civilization to reach her. The explanation behind this reasoning is that as he crawls across the floor he drags behind him two  clergymen and two grand pianos each with a carcass of a donkey on it, with the pianos referring to classical civilization and the clergymen being a metaphor of religion. He has physically become burdened with Christian morality and the beliefs of classic civilization.

If the audience was not already uncomfortably shifting in their seats, in walks the father, oblivious to the scene laid out before him. The father begins destroying the last of the boy’s childhood, by throwing the box and its contents out the window, unwillingly forcing him into manhood. At this point there is no doubt the boy and the father is one in the same person, by sleeping with his mother he has symbolically become his father. Receiving the book and pen being handed to him by his father, the son makes a face, remembering his aversion to the first day of school and symbolizing knowledge.

Time retreats as the son threatens his own father with a revolver, space is obliterated for the dying man so that the slow motion of agony begins within the walls of the room and ends under the trees. This is perhaps the only literal scene; it is a dreaming remembrance of the discovery of his crime. The men in this scene have not been shown before or after this (Buñuel). The son turns to his mother, covering his mouth as if to say “tell no one”, to emphasize his point, his mouth disappears, to reply his mother defiantly applies lipstick as if to say “I’ll tell who I please”. Seeing her defiance he reminds his mother of their incestuous incident, by the transplantation of her armpit hair where his mouth used to be, symbolic of cunnilingus. She is so shocked by his visual reminder of their sin that she runs out of the house, sticking her tongue out at him as she goes, in childish defiance, recalling that this is merely a dream.

This is primarily a subjective drama fashioned into a poem, but is none the less, a film of social consciousness (Vigo). Buñuel places intertitles right next to disarming, poetic, improbable characters that exceed language’s competence. Everything on which the body rests or halts everything which limits that strange body-distance, time- is dislocated in the course of this film. The only thing tying the disjointed scenes together is the striped box that appears throughout the movie. Nothing in this movie was intended to make sense; it was made to create a revolutionary shock amongst its viewers. However, it is human nature to make sense out of the things they do not understand. There are innumerous explanations of this movie, and without a version of understanding of the symbolism expressed it is hard to connect to any of the characters except the woman who, when watching for the first time with no explanation of the scenes, is seemingly being attacked by her would be rapist. However, with the symbolism of the story line being explained using the Freudian theory, the other characters become relatable as well.

Artistic film makers have a coarse knowledge of art and obey the sentimental arbitrary nature of his genius. Anti artistic film makers know nothing of art and films in a pure way, obeying only the technical necessities of his gadgets, and obeying the infantile and strikingly joyful instinct of his sporting physiology. Artistic cinema has not succeeded in determining any universal type of emotion, instead relying on the maximum expression of emotions. While anti artistic cinema has created a whole characteristic and extremely differentiated world of particular emotions and image types, clearly defined and understood by cinema goers (Dalí). Dali admires Man Ray for his attempts at creating an artistic film, leaving the viewer with a pure emotion strictly on a visual level. However, he sees anti artistic film as the more perfect film for its innate ability to create pure emotions of boredom and sadness.

To attest to the popularity of the film Un Chien Andalou, while on his Isolar tour, supporting his album Station to Station, David Bowie opened each of his shows with a projected sequence of surrealist images, one of which depicts a razor blade cutting into an eyeball. The visual element of the performances incorporated banks of fluorescent white light set against black backdrops creating a stark spectacle on a stage largely devoid of props or other visual distractions (Sandford). The staging featured Bowie, dressed in The Duke’s habitual black waistcoat and trousers, a pack of Gitanes placed ostentatiously in his pocket, moving stiffly among curtains of white light. If you have ever heard an audience groan at the opening scene, imagine an entire auditorium, most of whom were undoubtedly seeing it for the first time.


Charles Rycroft, A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis (London, 2nd Ed. 1995)

Luis Buñuel, My Last Sigh, tr. by Abigail Israel, (New York, 1984), pp. 101–26.

Luis Buñuel, My Last Sigh, tr. by Abigail Israel (New York, 1984), pp. 101–26.

Robert Aron, Films of Revolt [1929], in Richard Abel, ed., French Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology, 1907–1939 (Princeton, 1988), pp. 432–36.

Luis Buñuel, My Last Sigh, tr. by Abigail Israel (New York, 1984), pp. 101–26.

Jean Vigo, Toward a Social Cinema [1930], in L’Age d’or and Un Chien Andalou: Films by Luis Buñuel, tr. by Marianne Alexander, (New York, 1963), pp. 75–81.

Salvador Dalí, Art Films and Anti-Artistic Films [1927], in London, Hayward Gallery, Salvador Dalí: The Early Years, exh. cat., (1994), pp. 219–20.

 Christopher Sandford, Bowie: Loving the Alien, Warner Books, 1997

A Mutually Beneficial Relationship

The past couple days I have been thinking about starting this blog, it’s something I’m a little nervous about. The reason for being nervous is purely selfish, I did so much research to find this information and come to these conclusions, by sharing them someone else’s life will be so much easier. Not Fair. Maybe some poor soul with squinty eyes, cramping fingers, and kink in their neck will kiss their computer screen when they stumble upon it, but that will be the extent of the credit I receive, so much for me being humble. Here we are anyway, reading my first post on a new blog, welcome!!!

It won’t be something that I can post about frequently, but education is about give and take. I have learned something and now you can share in that knowledge with me. Occasionally when you have something to share about any given topic we can combine our knowledge to create an even greater understanding. That may be what I am most excited about, inspiring someone so much that they want to write a comment to share something I didn’t know. Out of fear that I am making myself look too smart, I am merely a student who has had a couple teachers that have been inspiring. Their enthusiasm for their subjects has been motivation to find my own niche in this world and to take pride in the research I have done, even if I am more often than not, scratching things off the list of possible niches.

Ever since my first piercing on Saint Patrick’s Day so many years ago, I have been interested in Body Modifications. Where does each one come from, what does it mean, what was its purpose. Could this be my niche, my home in Art History? A class that I took this semester caused this curiosity to resurface. It’s ironic because this class was horribly boring and the teacher skimmed over this aspect of indigenous cultures by allowing his personal feelings over modern modifications to guide his lecture. Shame on him, but it was enough to create the need to know more.

(In case you’re curious, my very first piercing was a Daith, followed by a Snug, stretching my ears to two gauges, my nose, and my most prized piercing to date, a Conch.)